OW Debug - Notice
Message: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated
File: /home/bwalters45/public_html/scc/skadate-10.3.9100/ow_core/request.php
Line: 69
OW Debug - Warning
Message: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable
File: /home/bwalters45/public_html/scc/skadate-10.3.9100/ow_plugins/virtual_gifts/bol/virtual_gifts_service.php
Line: 311
OW Debug - Notice
Message: Unparenthesized `a ? b : c ? d : e` is deprecated. Use either `(a ? b : c) ? d : e` or `a ? b : (c ? d : e)`
File: /home/bwalters45/public_html/scc/skadate-10.3.9100/ow_plugins/newsfeed/classes/event_handler.php
Line: 1436
OW Debug - Notice
Message: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated
File: /home/bwalters45/public_html/scc/skadate-10.3.9100/ow_libraries/jevix/jevix.class.php
Line: 980
OW Debug - Notice
Message: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated
File: /home/bwalters45/public_html/scc/skadate-10.3.9100/ow_libraries/jevix/jevix.class.php
Line: 991
OW Debug - Notice
Message: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated
File: /home/bwalters45/public_html/scc/skadate-10.3.9100/ow_libraries/jevix/jevix.class.php
Line: 995
OW Debug - Notice
Message: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated
File: /home/bwalters45/public_html/scc/skadate-10.3.9100/ow_libraries/jevix/jevix.class.php
Line: 995
OW Debug - Notice
Message: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated
File: /home/bwalters45/public_html/scc/skadate-10.3.9100/ow_libraries/jevix/jevix.class.php
Line: 999
OW Debug - Notice
Message: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated
File: /home/bwalters45/public_html/scc/skadate-10.3.9100/ow_libraries/jevix/jevix.class.php
Line: 999
OW Debug - Notice
Message: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated
File: /home/bwalters45/public_html/scc/skadate-10.3.9100/ow_libraries/jevix/jevix.class.php
Line: 999
`osrs gold osrs gp` related blog posts - Social Cents Club

User blogs

Tag search results for: "osrs gold osrs gp"
Provider


It can be solved by requiring players to OSRS GP give back to the game and getting rid of the circulating currency. Although I don't know much about the Araxxor issue, I think it's a good idea to give incentives for players to spend their money in a way that does not go to another player.

As a fairly inactive player, I don't have a holistic enough knowledge of the game to propose an acceptable method of doing that. There are ways to eliminate money that have been around for years, such as the sawmill, shops, etc. They were able to keep inflation under control from 2001 to 2009.

It's evident that it's not enough, but. It is possible to adjust the prices and selections of shops to ensure there's more spending just like actual shops. Perhaps the amount of gold dropped by monsters needs to be reduced, low as it may already be. Also, I might be wrong, but things are getting worse now because the inflation rate is inherently exponential, whereas the rate at which one can acquire GP is not.

What was your most memorable old school runescape buy gold game-related achievement? It should be something you are proud of once you have achieved it. It could be anything from an achievement cape or level, killing bosses, working in your community or community, etc. My number would be 99 Defense. It was long on my list due to the significance of defense in tanking. I haven't had members since 2006, so I had to finish it in freeplay obviously, which was murder. Also, it was my time of inactivity between 2007 and 2013.

Skyzhay Yesterday, 11:16PM · Tags: osrs gold osrs gp
Provider



If you do not feel comfortable OSRS GP using Qualtrics I understand but my experience let us me think it is alright. So let's say I replied this poll 100% honestly, who would you imagine gets that data? After GDPR I've felt pressured with every single site ever to track and track me it is disgusting, and even disgusting that it was all happening before without my understanding. Taking a look at the survey link and the fundamental disclosures in the bottom of the webpage it does not seem the Jagex is having a third-party firm so if the only men and women who would have immediate access to your information would be the survey developers who can pull exports out of the database to disperse internally. EU also includes some fairly powerful data privacy laws that (at least my US based company which often interacts with Qualtrics links) are followed fairly strictly by the survey programmers and information hosting sites.

After running through the poll Jagex definitely is apparently operating solo on this one. No third party company would allow participants directly enter inside their contact information (because it would mean they'd lose your business to their customer [not a nefarious thing]) and also the only area I found kinda strange was the telephone number request in the end. I'd have substituted that using a check box for recontacting and then pipe-in the email that you could optionally have set in earlier for confirmation. I think you are fine answering this questionnaire if you have privacy issues because basically all information is unknown and it's using an industry-standard system of Qualtrics. Jagex probably doesn't have market research ISO certificates but this is a quick annual survey in order that they would not have to have any.

It is my hope that this feedback encourages the team to make polls more targeted to the viewers who actively take part in the content they're polling, or use them as an advisory tool rather than a ruling. It would be interesting if they reveal some of the results of this survey. I answered the exact opposite, that polling is at the core of OSRS and they need to stick with it. For clarity, I answered that polling is in the core of OSRS. The survey system empowers the whole playerbase to start freeform discussion on the proposed changes/additions made to Runescape itself and it is absolutely a terrific way to gather feedback and people comment on something. With that said, I really don't think the present format meets the best interests of Runescape.

I really don't believe the player base is very good at determining which content, based on virtue, is great for integrity and the overall health of Runescape long-term. Based on polling, the neighborhood liked NMZ but it was significant to remove. Players don't vote for any changes that make things tougher for them personally but over time which becomes a negative as content becomes easier and achievements are diluted, these are very minor but readily accumulate.

Another example is PvP and PK adjustments that are voted against. People even voted against letting pures wear lucky chaps. Improve profits and so the impact of this to accounts that were ordinary will have been to slightly increase the need. This is not an example of polling meeting the interests of Runescape, it's only a meme of not enjoying pures. If we just see updates that suit the same 75 percent of people every time the remaining 25% become increasingly marginalised, which is not a fantastic equilibrium when those 75/25 are seemingly so frequently the same individuals.

Not everyone is going to make runescape 2007 gold sound choices while voting, or create the"right" alternative. If literally everyone made the most educated, most informed voting choices. The United States would not have the president it does. Nothing longer, real world example of unemployment. Our voting system isn't perfect, but we all got to make sure we don't wind up pushed down RS3 players. Our throats. There are unquestionably improves that may be made that do not undermine it though (that aren't being achieved or attempted).



Provider



What ruin and will kill its own integrity and OSRS GP this game is the voting system's continuous disregard which jagex is hoping to push as evident with this poll and has been doing. If jagex appeared as much as they say that they do about it, then they'd not have unclear and confusing wording in polls. Its a thing also. You'd think it'd get evidence read or something. On the contrary, the polling system functions to actual life democracy.

Abolish or I'm certainly not advocating to dismiss the polling system and it is a tool in holding the devs into account. On the flip side, the present polling system doesn't function and necessitates flexibility or improvements to satisfy the requirements of their participant base. When 99 percent of articles is left to decide, I can not agree with all the exaggeration on your post about the continuous disregard of things. It is essential to be aware that the occasions when they have been felt by Jagex needed to diverge in the outcome that is polled, it was because they felt compelled to by the issues together with the voting system itself.

The VLS addition is a clear and recent example of the: Jagex poll several minor PvP changes/updates that don't pass and do not believe the community are fairly currently evaluating the content on merit. This means Jagex take that PvP buffs/content will not ever pass surveys or perform them. Polls either need to become a) pitched to people who actively participate in or understand the relevant content, b) taken as powerful advisement rather than gospel, c) lower threshold, or d) simply make more integrity changes.

While sometimes a developer has overlooked something important and players may assist them--because it's the players that play Runescape--that the participant base frequently makes really dumb decisions because they do not really spend much time considering what a change could do, they don't have any development experience, and they are often quite self-interested. In the instance of OSRS, the players have absolutely vetoed bad ideas multiple occasions before, however they also have vetoed great thoughts, and also the absolute dumbest ideas aren't the things that get polled, they are the things which get indicated and upvoted right here on the subreddit.

I feel that way also. But I don't mind the notion of providing control to the OSRS group. Because besides PvP stuff, and updates dividing like a brand new ability. I feel like that they already have a good deal of freedom to design content anyhow. It is not like everything they poll gets down taken. Sounds like more of a motive to maintain the polling system. The updates which are liked will pass. The updates a great part of the player base dislike won't pass.

Another thing to think buy 2007 runescape gold about is simply because something fails a survey doesn't mean it can't be reworked by them and repoll it. What is great about situations like that is they will find a lot of feedback from players and adjust the content before adding it to Runescape. Then a bunch of players will be marginalized for wanting another skill or for being Pkers, as someone said though. Eventually they will get jaded and leave Runescape, which I'm sure Jagex does not want. I honestly voted but with voting towards the groups gaining more power over decisions and Jagex that take part in it. As someone and a pker who enjoys pvp I feel that is my only alternative.




Provider

Feedback is important. There are numerous OSRS GP instances of this OSRS team pitching an upgrade and the neighborhood basically reacting like"woah woah woah hold on, did you consider this ___". Turns out jagex did not consider said thing, and the upgrade was better because of the neighborhood opinions (or would not have been good w/o it). These are long term jmods which are liked by the community and general understand their stuff/produce upgrades that are good. They are still human and can not understand everything. If the same upgrade were to happen in RS3, it would've gone in without the prospect of feedback, or just ignored (though we have had instances of ignored comments in OSRS, see prif/crystal armour and bh2) and the upgrade would have remained bad/dead/broken on birth. So them engaging and acting on comments and feedback is essential to OSRS.They can introduce utensils kind of like the iron spit in Runescape game, tie it in to smithing. Hell, let us get a grill or BBQ going. It would be a good incentive to some really use. An equilibrium to it could be a higher burn opportunity. The only worry is balancing the food meals for pvp. Completely agree. I believe like most abilities have different routes you can choose (slow and cheap, expensive and quick ) and a variety of methods. Runecrafting is so stagnate the xp rates are shithouse and never grow as you go high in levels. Bloods are afk but nevertheless demotivating to even reach 77 and simply cease at.

I didn't say anything about new updates being awful however. They've done well with a lot of the content that feels oldschool. Expansion is perhaps the update we've ever needed in that regard. What I dislike is that the concept of Jagex using OSRS as an alternate timeline in which they never screwed up RS2. I really don't think Runescape in its present state is similar to that, but things might change. They never expected OSRS getting the"primary Runescape match" and polls similar to this one make me incredibly suspicious with what they've been planning behind closed doors to the years to come. I want to have the ability to play with the Old School without worrying about another RS3 fiasco that we've always known and loved. Eventually one day nobody will have the ability to play Runescape ever again. Sucks to think about.

I voted in this, I truly believe that the  polling in OSRS ought to be taken off. No one person speaks for everybody and when people only vote to spite othrrs or in for self interest, we WILL NEVER get anything rewarding. This is why the devs need to choose to create cont quest lines and quests. I need skills that are new, I need this match to grow. Together with the last ability polled, I truly felt as though we had a shot, it filled a place which has been lacking ( the ability to generate cloth gear ), but.id be prepared to wager that many voted no because (her der no nehw sckillz for me!

Polling only lets the maxed neckbeards continue to deny content that is new into Runescape. The amount of returning and new mid-high lvl players that they get will readily off-balance the sober bank standing minority they'll lose for a month until they resub back again. RS3 is what occurs without user polling. The neighborhood choosing what goes in Runescape means the playerbase wanted a thing and Runescape won't be pushed into the floor from aqful upgrades. One for all is the system you are proposing. Polling is the collective view of the userbase. It is everyone with a voice.

The very first question about rs gold 2007 frequently do I play this sport, there should be a choice of,"I am now taking a rest " That is fine. My issue is that I suck at this game. I'm 1600 total but I am not too efficient or fight focused so that I haven't bossed or done master quests. So it did not give me an option to state I don't understand in regards to those queries. So I put neutral which I think throws off the ethics of that response. Also when you were talking about Jagex that I had no clue how to answer those questions. I don't understand anything about Jagex out the OSRS team which I believe is a relatively small section of your organization.
Provider



In addition, I wish I understood OSRS GP anything regarding your parent firm MacArthur. They are a ghost in the internet. Furthermore, the only think I truly do know is that Jagex has given up on every game they have ever tried to make out of RuneScape. There was no option for simply updating skills or stating I don't need you to concentrate on some of those choices at all. Eventually for the query,"what do you consider customer care?" An option ought to be,"What customer service?"

Repeatable quests, HD customers, once again hoping to push new abilities, etc.. Questions regarding how polling content works specifically is terrifying, provided Jagex's recent penchant for only forcing content that has failed multiple surveys through as ethics updates.

Not to mention: Asking for people's favourite games, place of residence, employment status, and even their contact number is very inappropriate for this type of survey. Appears nakedly enjoy an attempt for collecting marketing data available. Editing this in now that I think about it more: The more I consider the telephone number bit, the slimier it feels to be fair. Most of us know fully damn well that Jagex is not going to call anybody who answers this survey. Leading people to give their personal information to a poll under the guise of"Wow you're so smart, perhaps we'll call you to your opinions on upcoming stuff!" Is totally disgusting, and if anything else, I did not respond extreme enough.

The main answer I gave in this survey I wish to get around: The last decision on any content should be produced with BOTH the community AND Jagex working together to produce content that's actually worth adding to Runescape. Players have demonstrated they'll vote yes to a pretty absurd shit (See the Tome debacle) where Jagex needs to step in and understand that asking was a mistake, even while Jagex has also demonstrated when they forge ahead in their own it doesn't work out nicely for us. Trying to frame this query since an either/or is leaving out a huge amount of nuance in the problem, and this is something which applies to numerous issues discussed in the poll.

This survey provides me the vibes that you guys actually want to be known to your communication with your community, and that you're well knowledgeable about the gaming world around you. Neither of them are especially correct. Jagex"communicates" with their community more than a number of other games, but not nearly the maximum, particularly once you don't count polls which are crampacked full of voting biasing issues, questions which shouldn't be inquired, and (what feels like) intentional misinformation or lack of crucial information required to make an educated decision.

You are very afraid of repeatable old school runescape gold quests and OSRS HD which will be discretionary and that won't impact you at all in any way, nor will either influence Runescape for you because you is cosmetic and the other won't give rewards? This kind of overreaction makes it hard to choose what you are saying seriously. And new abilities - those things that a large majority of players want, but maybe not quite 75% in any particular case - yes, truly Jagex are blowing off their entire player-base here. Don't forget the large number of people that spite vote contrary to pvp updates simply because they don't enjoy the community. Unpolled changes are fine if that's the case.
Provider




I really don't believe that the participant OSRS GP base is particularly great at determining which content, based on virtue, is good for the health and integrity of Runescape long-term. According to polling, the community generally liked 6hr NMZ but it was significant to remove. Players don't vote for any modifications that make things harder for them personally but over time which becomes a drawback as content becomes simpler and achievements are diluted, these are very slight but readily add up.

Another example is PvP and PK related changes which are consistently voted against. Individuals even voted against allowing pures wear chaps, despite having the ability to wear the variants. The only effect of this to accounts would have been to boost the need and therefore improve profits. This is not an example of polling fulfilling the interests of Runescape, it is just a meme of not liking pures. If we only see updates that match the exact same 75 percent of people every time the remaining 25 percent become more and more marginalised, which is not a good equilibrium when those 75/25 are apparently so often the very same individuals.

Not everyone is going to make sound decisions while voting, or create the"right" alternative. If literally everyone left the most educated voting choices. The United States wouldn't have the president does. Nothing longer, real world example of unemployment. Our voting system isn't perfect, but we all got to make sure we do not end up shoved down RS3 players throats. Our throats. There are definitely improves that could be made that don't undermine it though (that are not being done or tried ).

What destroy and will kill its integrity and this game is the disregard of the voting system which jagex is hoping to push as evident by this poll and has been doing. Then they'd not always have unclear and confusing wording in surveys also if jagex cared as much as they say that they do about it. Its a thing. You'd think it would get something or evidence read. Not even bare minimum work. To the contrary, the polling system works differently to life democracy. Our votes enable elected representatives who make decisions on our behalf so that they can (ideally ) be educated, informed and objective about the difficulties.

I'm not advocating to dismiss or rs 2007 gold abolish the polling system and it is a helpful tool in holding the devs. On the other hand, the current polling system requires improvements or flexibility to satisfy the needs of the participant base and doesn't function. When 99% of content is left to the community to pick, I can not agree with all the exaggeration in your post about the continuous disregard of items that are polled. It is important to note that the events when they have been believed by Jagex needed to diverge from the polled result, it was because they felt forced to by the difficulties with the voting system.
Provider


The VLS inclusion is a recent and OSRS GP clear example of the: Jagex poll several minor PvP changes/updates that don't pass and don't believe the community are pretty currently evaluating the material on merit. This implies Jagex take that PvP buffs/content will not ever pass surveys or perform them anyhow. Polls either need to become a) pitched to people who actively engage in or understand that the appropriate content( b) taken as powerful advisement rather than gospel( c) lower threshold, or d) simply earn more integrity adjustments.

This is 100% true for every single game's player base. While sometimes a developer has missed something significant and players can assist them--because it's the players that play Runescape--that the participant base often makes quite dumb decisions because they don't actually spend much time thinking about what a change might do, they do not have some development experience, and they're often quite self-interested. In the case of OSRS, the gamers have completely vetoed bad thoughts multiple occasions before, but they also have vetoed great ideas, and the absolute dumbest ideas generally aren't the items that make polled, they are the things which get indicated and upvoted right on the subreddit.

I feel that way. But I don't mind the thought of providing control to the OSRS team. Because apart from PvP stuff, and updates dividing like a ability that is brand new. I feel like that they have a good deal of freedom to design content anyway. It isn't like everything they poll gets down taken. Like if they polled DT2, menaphos and raids it would pass without it even being close. Sounds like more of a motive to keep the polling system to me. Will pass. The updates that a good part of the player base dislike will not pass.

Another aspect to consider is just because something neglects a survey does not mean that they repoll it afterwards and can't rework it. What's great about situations like that is they will find a lot of feedback from gamers and adjust the material before adding it to Runescape. As someone said though, then a group of gamers will be marginalized for wanting another skill or for being Pkers. Eventually they will get jaded and depart Runescape, which I'm convinced Jagex does not want. I voted for the poll system but with voting towards those groups getting power and Jagex that actively participate in it. As somebody and a pker who enjoys pvp I think that is my only option.

Feedback is important. There are rs 2007 gold many instances of the OSRS team pitching an upgrade and the community essentially responding like"woah woah woah continue, did you consider this ___". Turns out jagex did not consider said thing, and the upgrade was better due to the neighborhood feedback (or would not have been great w/o it). These are long term jmods which are enjoyed by the general and community understand their stuff/produce upgrades that are very good. They're still human and can't understand everything. If the same upgrade were to take place in RS3, it would have gone without the chance of opinions, or simply ignored (though we've had instances of ignored comments in OSRS, see prif/crystal armour and bh2) along with the upgrade would've stayed bad/dead/broken on birth. So feedback and them engaging and acting on feedback is essential to OSRS.Maybe they could introduce utensils kind of like the iron spit in Runescape game, tie it into smithing. Hell, let us get a grill or BBQ going. It could be a fantastic incentive to some really use. A balance to it might be a burn chance. The food food for pvp would be balancing. Completely agree. I believe like most abilities have various routes you can choose (slow and cheap, expensive and fast) and a variety of methods. Runecrafting is stagnate the xp rates are shithouse and never increase as you go high in levels. Bloods are afk but nevertheless demotivating to even get to 77 and many simply cease at.
Provider

I understand but my experience let OSRS GP us me think it's fine if you don't feel comfortable with Qualtrics. So let's say I answered this poll frankly, who'd you imagine gets that data? After GDPR I have felt pressured with every single website ever to track and track me it is disgusting, and even disgusting that it was happening before without my understanding. Taking a look at the survey connection and the basic disclosures in the bottom of the webpage it does not seem the Jagex is having a third party fielding company so if the only men and women who would have immediate access to your advice would be the survey developers who will pull exports out of the database to distribute internally. EU also has some pretty strong data privacy legislation which (at least my US based firm which frequently interacts with Qualtrics connections ) are followed pretty strictly from the survey developers and information hosting sites.

After running through the survey Jagex definitely is apparently running solo on this one. No third party firm would allow participants directly enter in their contact information (since it would mean they would lose your business to their customer [not a nefarious thing]) and the only area I found kinda strange was that the phone number request in the conclusion. I'd have substituted that with a check box for recontacting and pipe-in the email you could optionally have put in sooner for confirmation. I think you are fine answering this questionnaire if you have privacy concerns since basically all information is anonymous and it is using an industry-standard platform of Qualtrics. Jagex probably doesn't have market study ISO certifications but hey this is a fast annual survey so they wouldn't have to have any.

I hope this feedback encourages the staff to make surveys more targeted to the audience who knowingly participate in the content they are polling, or use them as an advisory tool instead of a judgment. It'd be interesting if they reveal a few of the outcomes of the survey. I replied the opposite, that polling is in the crux of OSRS and they should stick with it. For clarity, I also answered that polling is at the core of OSRS. The survey system empowers the entire playerbase to start freeform conversation on the proposed changes/additions created to Runescape itself and it is absolutely a great way to collect feedback and people comment on something. With that said, I really don't believe the present format satisfies the best interests of Runescape.

I really don't believe that the player base is very great at determining which content, based on virtue, is great for the overall health and integrity of Runescape long term. Based on polling, the community liked 6hr NMZ but it was important to remove. Players do not vote for any modifications which make things tougher for them but over time which becomes a drawback as content becomes easier and achievements are diluted, these can very slight but easily add up.

Another example is PvP and rs 3 gold PK related adjustments that are voted against. People even voted against allowing pures wear lucky chaps, despite having the ability to wear the normal variations. The only impact of the to accounts that were normal would have been to marginally boost the demand and so improve profits from clue scrolls. This isn't an illustration of polling fulfilling the interests of Runescape, it's just a meme of not enjoying pures. If we only see updates which match the exact same 75 percent of people every time the remaining 25% become more and more marginalised, which isn't a good balance when those 75/25 are seemingly so frequently the very same people.

Provider

The main answer I gave in OSRS GP this survey that I want to get across: The last decision on any material should be made with BOTH the community AND Jagex working together to generate content that is really worth adding to Runescape. Players have demonstrated they will vote yes to a fairly absurd shit (Watch the Tome debacle) at which Jagex needs to intervene and understand that asking was a mistake, while Jagex has also demonstrated when they forge ahead on their own it doesn't work out well for us. Trying to frame this query as an either/or is leaving out a massive quantity of nuance from the issue, and this is something that applies to numerous issues discussed in the poll.

This survey provides me the vibes which you guys actually need to be famous to your communication with your community, and that you're well knowledgeable about the gaming world about you. None of them are especially true. Jagex"communicates" with their neighborhood over a number of other games, but not nearly the most, particularly when you don't count surveys that are crampacked filled with voting biasing problems, questions which shouldn't be asked, and (what feels like) intentional misinformation or lack of vital information required to make an educated choice.

You're very afraid of repeatable quests and OSRS HD which will both be optional and that will not impact you at all whatsoever, nor will influence Runescape for you because one is decorative and the other won't give rewards? This kind of overreaction makes it hard to choose what you are saying seriously. And new abilities - those things that a sizable majority of players want, but maybe not quite 75% in any given case - yes, truly Jagex are ignoring their whole player-base here. Don't overlook the large number of people that spite vote contrary to pvp updates simply because they do not like the community. Unpolled changes are fine if that is the case.

It's correct that the very best content of OSRS normally come in BOTH Jagex and community serving each other. But we must remember that Jagex by his own is also able of great surprise if given the opportunity ( consider how Twisted League was awesome, and we didnt knew much about it before launch ) I think if all League content was polled ahead, it could have been alot different and likely not as exctiting and surprising. What's wrong with repeatable quests? And here I thought the whole leveling experience could be shattered with this one update.

I agree with everything you mentioned except for you getting your underwear on fire for them asking for phone number optionally at the end of the survey. There was also no need, whatsoever, to use your RS email, and you could always offer a imitation in Runescape game name if this area was demanded (not sure if it had been ). Extreme reaction for three disciplines you had on filling out autonomy. Employment status is also market study. You'd answer a question nowadays for virtually any survey that's trying to become serious about the demographics.

I might be in the minority buy old school runescape gold here but I'd love to see something such as dungoneering added. Found it interesting that this came up in the poll but unlucky it had been tied to summoning (yuck). Really enjoyed dungoneering and exploring/randomness' group facets into it. Also having to produce your own gear was cool so that the wealthiest players didn't always have an advantage going through the skill (nothing against these players, just found it was fun for the ability ). OSRS edition of dung could be sailing. So when its repolled later on vote yes, it would be nice for OSRS to receive its own exclusive skill much like our quests.

 

Provider

Feedback is important. There are rs2007 gold numerous instances of this OSRS team pitching an upgrade and the community basically reacting like"woah woah woah hold on, did you consider this ___". Turns out jagex did not think about mentioned thing, and the upgrade was better because of the neighborhood opinions (or would not have been good w/o it). These are the community long term jmods that are enjoyed by the general and community know their very good updates. They are still human and can not understand everything. If the same update were to happen in RS3, it would have gone in without the prospect of feedback, or simply ignored (though we've had cases of ignored feedback in OSRS, see prif/crystal armour and bh2) and the update would've stayed bad/dead/broken on birth. So feedback and them engaging and acting on comments is essential to OSRS.Perhaps they can present utensils kind of like the iron spit in Runescape match, then tie it into smithing. Hell, let's get a grill or BBQ going. It could be a fantastic incentive to a really use a flame you have made to cook instead of a range. A balance to it could be a burn opportunity. The only worry would be balancing the food meals for pvp. Completely agree. I feel like most skills have various paths you can choose (cheap and slow, expensive and fast) and many different methods. Runecrafting is indeed stagnate the xp prices are shithouse and never increase as you go high in levels. Yeah bloods are afk but nevertheless demotivating to even reach 77 and just cease for your dairies.

Nothing was said by me about upgrades being bad. They've done well with a lot. Hosidius growth is perhaps the update we've ever had in that respect. What I dislike is the concept of Jagex using OSRS instead of timeline in which they never screwed up RS2. I don't believe Runescape in its current state is like this, but things might change. They never anticipated OSRS becoming the"primary Runescape game" and surveys like this one make me unbelievably suspicious with what they have been planning behind closed doors for the years to come. I want to have the ability to play the Old School without worrying about the other RS3 fiasco, that we've always known and loved. Eventually one day nobody will be able to play Runescape ever again. Sucks to consider.

I hunted in thisI completely believe that the polling in OSRS should be removed. Nobody person speaks for all and when people simply vote or in to spite othrrs, we WILL NEVER get anything rewarding. This is why the devs need to decide to make quests and cont quest lines. I want skills that are new, I want this game to grow.

Polling lets the neckbeards that is maxed continue to deny new content into Runescape. The quantity of returning and new mid-high lvl players that they get will readily off-balance the vocal bank status minority they will lose for a month till they resub back again. RS3 is what happens without user polling. The community picking what goes in Runescape signifies the playerbase wanted something and Runescape will not be driven to the floor from updates that are aqful. One for all is the system you are currently proposing. Polling is the view of this userbase. It's everyone having a voice.

The very first question about buy OSRS GP frequently do I play this game, there should be a choice of,"I'm currently taking a rest " Sometimes I get burnt out. Which is fine. My main issue is I suck at this game. I'm 1600 complete but I'm not overly efficient or fight focused so I haven't bossed or done master quests. Therefore it did not give me an option to state I really don't know in regards to those queries. I put neutral which I presume throws off the ethics of the response. Additionally when you were talking about Jagex I didn't have any clue how to answer those questions. I don't know anything about Jagex out the OSRS team that I believe is a comparatively small part of your organization.
Pages: 1 2 Next
Enter your twitter handle.
Enter your Google Plus profile or page ID (e.g., 103708169695782281000).
Enter your Facebook page username.

Social Share

Share: